A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Posted: November 5th, 2022

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Requirements
Article Review Steps
Step 1: select a quantitative research article of your topic of interest published within the last three (3) years.
P.S. My choice is autism
Step 2: Write a two-page critique of the article in a Word Doc integrating course readings.
Step 3: Complete the Johns Hopkins Quantitative Research Appraisal Tool (Links to an external site.).
Step 4: Upload your Word doc analysis with the Johns Hopkins Research Appraisal Tool (in the appendix) to TurnItIn. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

ORDER NOW.           

Content of critique should include at a minimum:
1. Participant sampling,
2. Questionnaires/tools,
3. Ethics,
4. Analysis of findings,
5. Limitations,
6. Discussion section,
7. Summary: Application (translation) to practice specialty, and future implications.
Preparing the Assignment:
1. APA Format According to 6th edition.
2. Word Doc per assignment requirements
3. Word Doc Format:
Cover page, no abstract, introduction (no heading per APA), body of the paper/review, reference list, appendix with Johns Hopkins appraisal doc. For review sections refer to your readings and the Johns Hopkins Research Appraisal Tool. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.
• Article title, author, journal, publication date
• Evidence level and quality
• Analysis of the study methodology (specific to study type, e.g., qualitative versus quantitative versus non-research)
Reference List should include the chosen article and other resources used to construct the review, such as course textbook, Johns Hopkins Evidence Based Practice: Model and Guidelines (2018), and How to Read a Paper by Greenhalgh (2014). A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Quantitative Research Article Critique: Autism

Researchers in the past decade have been interested in understanding autism in details, which has necessitated for various quantitative studies to be conducted. Similarly, MacFarlane et al. (2017) conducted quantitative research on autism. They primarily aimed at evaluating disfluency or language impairment among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Autism is a condition, which is characterized by impairment in communication and social interaction (Stephens et al., 2018). Additionally, children with this condition tend to portray repetitive or restricted patterns of behaviour. While this article has addressed various concepts, this paper will analyze participant sampling, questionnaires/tools, ethics, analysis of findings, limitations, discussion section, and summary of the study. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Participant Sampling

The researchers sampled 115 children from Portland to take part in the study. The participants were aged between 4 and 8 years. Fifty-one children who were struggling with autism spectrum disorder were involved in the study. Forty-five were male children, while six were female.

Questionnaires/Tools

The researchers used the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence assessment tools to evaluate the level of participants’ IQ during the study. According to Syeda and Climie (2019), the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence can be described as a comprehensive clinical tool, which is designed to evaluate the cognitive functioning. It applied among children whose ages range between 2 years six months and seven years seven months (Cook et al., 2019). During this study, the researchers used WPPSI-III and WPPSI-IV to assess the cognitive functioning of children aged below seven years and those above seven years respectively. Specifically, Verbal IQ (VIQ), full-scale IQ (FSIQ), and performance IQ (PIQ) were used during the assessment. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Ethics

Some ethical measures were considered during the study. In particular, MacFarlane et al. (2017) adhered to the set standards while using the Wechsler scales tests to measure the level of participants’ cognitive functioning.

Analysis of Findings

The researchers conducted inferential analyses. The analysis aimed to detect differences among the group members. The set statistical independence assumptions of logistic regression were not satisfied in preliminary analyses. Consequently, the researchers conducted inferential analyses in which mixed-effects logistic regression was applied. Additionally, the mixed-effects regressions involved the use of the R package lme4. Finally, the researchers conducted exploratory analyses in which correlations with Kendall’s τb were measured. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Limitations

The study had two major limitations. First, the researchers completed a schema for disfluency coding before any inferential analyses. This action makes the results of the study less reliable. Secondly, parents were involved in completing the Children’s Communication Checklist. They were expected to complete a 70-item questionnaire to evaluate the communication abilities of their children while in natural settings. This move compromised the accuracy of the results since some parents were not competent in administering these questionnaires. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Discussion

Speech disfluencies were categorized using a simple schema. Also, the researchers used schema for coding disfluency type among children with speech deficiency. It was used to measure language deficiency and typical development among children with autism. The results indicate that content mazes were preferred over fillers by the ASD group. On the contrary, the preference for both content mazes and fillers was equal among the TD group. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Summary

The knowledge acquired from this article will be applied in clinical practices, thus improving mental health status. Notably, practitioners will use WPPSI-III and WPPSI-IV to assess the cognitive functioning of children. WPPSI-III will be used to assess children aged seven years and below while WPPSI-IV will be used to assess those above seven years. A Quantitative Sensory Testing Approach to Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.