Posted: January 16th, 2023
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
The conducted critical appraisal discloses about racial discrimination experienced by minorities in the healthcare facilities. Most healthcare facilities in the US provide the White with better care services than minority patients suffering from a similar condition. For instance, Blacks living in the US are not offered quality health services despite forming the largest minority group in the country (Noonan et al., 2016). The lack of quality care, in turn, compromises the health status of blacks. Additionally, it results in a high morbidity and mortality rate among this ethnic group (Noonan et al., 2016). Therefore, some measures need to be implemented to improve the overall health status of minorities in the country. A best practice, in this case, involves the use of tracking/reminder systems in healthcare facilities.Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.
Tracking and/or reminder systems will play a significant role in improving the overall quality of care provided to the minorities in the country. Health care providers use these systems to monitor patients’ activities such as scheduled follow-up visits, lab results, consultations and referrals. Thus, these systems improve the overall patient outcome and minimize potential liability for the practitioners (Craig et al., 2015). First, these systems will be adopted in adult general prevention, thus preventing individuals from suffering from various conditions. Additionally, these systems will be implemented in adult cancer screening. Consequently, cancer patients will be relieved of severe cancer symptoms, thus improving their quality of life and lifespan.Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.
Studies reveal about the effectiveness of tracking systems in healthcare practices. Therefore, these systems will enable providers to improve the quality of care provided to ethnic minority patients in medical facilities.
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.
In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template.Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Full APA formatted citation of selected article. Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Evidence Level * (I, II, or III) Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).** Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria). Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (You need to list the actual tests done). Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative findings (You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data). Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research Appraisal and Study Quality Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? Key findings Outcomes General Notes/Comments *These levels are from the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence Level and Quality Guide • Level I Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis • Level II Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis • Level III Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis • Level IV Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence • Level V Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence **Note on Conceptual Framework • Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework • Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework. Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.• As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.” • Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature. Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.• Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two. References The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University (n.d.). Johns Hopkins nursing dvidence-based practice: appendix C: evidence level and quality guide. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_c_evidence_level_quality_guide.pdf Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your” House”. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26. Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework.Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.